[erlang-questions] Erlang "object-oriented" after all?
Wed Nov 25 15:14:06 CET 2009
# Michael Turner 2009-11-24:
> I ran across a very interesting exchange with Alan Kay, who most likely
> coined the term "object-oriented programming."
> If you'll excuse some (only slightly tendentious) editing of his remarks:
> "I thought of objects being like biological cells and/or individual
> computers on a network, only able to communicate with messages . . . .
No, you didn't. If you did, you would certainly have noticed that individual
cells/computers live concurrently and communicate asynchronously, which is not
how your objects behave.
SCNR, I still remember the disappointment of discovering (ages back) that
Objective-C objects didn't really fulfill the "they behave like real-world
objects" promise given by the (otherwise pretty good) NeXT book because
you couldn't "run objects in parallel" which sounded like something that
should obviously be possible.
More information about the erlang-questions