[erlang-questions] Erlang "object-oriented" after all?

Raoul Duke <>
Tue Nov 24 19:36:52 CET 2009


> Today that name would be
> the name of a module, but it feels like module names get a too
> overloaded meaning. I don't have an alternative suggestion yet,
> though.

perhaps take a look at Clojure

http://blog.higher-order.net/2009/11/23/clojure-circuit-breaker/

(requires javascript on to see the code samples)


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list