[erlang-questions] What are the cons and pros of using Erlang rather than java to develop server backend?
Ulf Wiger
ulf.wiger@REDACTED
Fri May 22 10:00:53 CEST 2009
G.S. wrote:
> True, that was a poor comparison between Mnesia and SQL, (or no
> comparison at all... as they are in different groups).
>
> Nevertheless, no one has really added to the cons and pros of Erlang vs
> Java, in general, for the development of backend.
Well, actually there was an article in a respected Swedish
computer magazine recently
http://www.idg.se/2.1085/1.213789/svensk-sprakdoldis-gor-succ%C3%A9
As it is in Swedish, let's turn to the venerable translator
translate.google.com:
"Such language is Erlang, which reached an enormous popularity recently.
According to Johan Bevemyr, system architect at Tail-f Systems, it is
possible to make huge cool stuff with few developers, such as bug fixes
in service without taking down the system. When Johan Bevemyr worked at
Ericsson, it was a study which showed that Erlang, the language that
[beat] Java and C + + with horse lengths.
- The survey shows that it is possible to achieve five times greater
productivity with Erlang than with object-oriented languages. This means
that a developer can write the same program in Erlang as five developers
in Java or C + +, he says."
(Apologies, Johan - your original statement, in Swedish, did sound
better. :)
BR,
Ulf W
--
Ulf Wiger
CTO, Erlang Training & Consulting Ltd
http://www.erlang-consulting.com
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list