[erlang-questions] variable argument preprocessor macros
Sun Jan 18 18:30:51 CET 2009
> well, i have been using exactly the aforementioned thing currently.
> however, having a bunch of identical (functionality wise) macros, with
> different names, didn't seem very nice...
What about using inline functions declared in the header file? You don't
have these problems then.
> > An alternative would be to use LFE which has proper lisp and scheme
> > If you like writing in lisp. :-)
> i have been playing around with scheme a bit, but for now i will pass :o)
> thank you
> In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and
> Emacs was the lambda.
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions