[erlang-questions] variable argument preprocessor macros

[Edwin Fine]

> well, i have been using exactly the aforementioned thing currently.
> however, having a bunch of identical (functionality wise) macros, with
> different names, didn't seem very nice...
>

What about using inline functions declared in the header file? You don't
have these problems then.
Regards,
Ed


>
> > An alternative would be to use LFE which has proper lisp and scheme
> macros.
> > If you like writing in lisp. :-)
> i have been playing around with scheme a bit, but for now i will pass :o)
>
> thank you
> anupam
> --
> In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and
> Emacs was the lambda.
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20090118/851d0f70/attachment.htm>