[erlang-questions] erlang emacs mode question
Mon Dec 14 23:28:55 CET 2009
BTW, the erlware erlang mode "erlware-mode" is much better than the erlang mode. Many bugs have been fixed and the skeletons are all edoc'd. It has been well maintained for over 2 years and is now way ahead IMHO. You can find it at erlware.org or over at the google code site code.google.com/p/erlware-mode
On 12/14/09 10:36 AM, "Göran Båge" <> wrote:
Yes it worked in R13B03, adding '%% ' and removing '%% '. Just my kind
of timing bringing it up just when it was fixed, it's been bugging me for
quite some time before I got around to asking:-). We are very slow
moving to new releases as we have long lived products running out there,
we still have some R9 based ones and I've not run R13 before, just installed
it as a matter of fact.
Dan Gudmundsson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Göran Båge<> wrote:
>> Is there a reason why the erlang emacs mode treats comment (^C^C) and
>> (^C^U) asymmetrical, comment adds '%% ' and uncomment removes '%'. Pretty
>> annoying if you ask me (but who would even think of doing that :-). It used
>> to work by adding only '%' earlier (maybe very much earlier like in R9 or
> Have you tried the latest erlang mode, on github or in R13B03?
> Both ^U^C^C and ^C^U works for me.
> PS: There are a lot of changes in the latest release of the erlang emacs mode,
> so if we broke something please report or even better post a patch.
--------------------- May the Snow be with you --------
Goran Bage MobileArts www.mobilearts.se
Tjarhovsgatan 56 SE-116 28 STOCKHOLM Sweden
phone: +46 733 358405
erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
More information about the erlang-questions