[erlang-questions] : : : : : : sctp_peeloff() support in OTP

Raimo Niskanen <>
Thu Apr 23 17:58:47 CEST 2009


On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:35:55PM +0200, Hynek Vychodil wrote:
> You are welcome ;-) but there is still some issue with Mail-Followup-To:
> which works same as Reply-To: in gmail. I don't know which one is broken
> gmail or your configuration.

Well I had a quick look. I will not waste too much time on it.
If I stumble on a solution I will fix it :-)

> 
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Raimo Niskanen <
> <raimo%>
> > wrote:
> 
> > Error on my side! I had a broken regexp in .muttrc that nobody
> > noticed before. And I also got some help from colleagues that
> > as we say in swedish likes to "write it on my nose" (rub it in).
> >
> > It should be fixed now. Thank you for pointing it out!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:09:49PM +0200, Hynek Vychodil wrote:
> > > I can see in your mail headers:
> > >
> > > Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:40:07 +0200
> > > From: Raimo Niskanen <<raimo%>
> > > <raimo%<raimo%>
> > >>
> > >
> > > To: Hynek Vychodil <>,
> > 
> > >
> > > Cc: Valentin Micic <>
> > > Subject: Re: : [erlang-questions] : : : : : sctp_peeloff() support in OTP
> > > Message-ID: <>
> > >
> > >
> > > Mail-Followup-To: Hynek Vychodil <>,
> > >       ,
> > >
> > >       Valentin Micic <>
> > >
> > > References: <>
> > > <>
> > > <>
> > > <>
> > >
> > >
> > > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> > > Content-Disposition: inline
> > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> > > In-Reply-To: <
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
> > > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Apr 2009 12:40:09.0355 (UTC)
> > > FILETIME=[A33685B0:01C9C410]
> > > X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
> > >
> > > W hen I try press Reply button it start reply to "Hynek Vychodil <
> > > >, , Valentin Micic <
> > > >" that is exactly content of Mail-Followup-To. I
> > have
> > > observed that thread is broken each time by your mail. It seems that
> > issue
> > > should be in your mailer but I can be wrong. There are two reasons: reply
> >
> > I see...
> >
> > > works wrong, threads are broken. Another possibility that gmail is broken
> > > seems less probably form me. Example headers which works fine follows:
> > >
> > > Message-Id: <>
> > > From: "Valentin Micic" <>
> > >
> > > To: "'Raimo Niskanen'" <<raimo%>
> > > <raimo%<raimo%>
> > >>,
> > >         <>
> > >
> > > Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:00:25 +0200
> > > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
> > > In-Reply-To: <>
> > >
> > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
> > > Thread-Index: AcnDJpmaVTDmZaUrSd+2jrLViPSL6QAOVgnQ
> > > Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] : :  :  sctp_peeloff() support in OTP
> > > X-BeenThere: 
> > >
> > > X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
> > >
> > > In-Reply-To: <>
> > > References: <>
> > >
> > >       <>
> > > Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:52:52 +0700
> > > Message-ID: <
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Maxim Treskin <>
> > > To: "" <>
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] : : : sctp_peeloff() support in OTP
> > > X-BeenThere: 
> > > X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
> > >
> > > But it seems that gmail ignores all except Subject to detect threads as
> > > mentioned Robert Raschke.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Raimo Niskanen <
> > > <raimo%>
> > <raimo%<raimo%>
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:08:45PM +0200, Hynek Vychodil wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > can you please use some mail client that supports threading? It's
> > fourth
> > > > > thread about "sctp_peeloff() support in OTP".
> > > > > Best regards
> > > > >    Hynek
> > > >
> > > > Well, at least my mail client supports its own mail threading;
> > > > I have only two threads. One singelton message is Valentin Mimic's
> > > > Message-Id: <>
> > > > that it did not manage to sort out. The others are fine.
> > > >
> > > > I use User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i. It has been around very long
> > > > and works finefor me. As you see it supplies both In-Reply-To:
> > > > and References: headers, and gmail as you use is mostly
> > > > very good at tracking threads.
> > > >
> > > > It is strange that you are experiencing problems.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Raimo Niskanen <
> > > > > <raimo%>
> > <raimo%<raimo%>
> > >
> > > > <raimo%<raimo%>
> > <raimo%<raimo%>
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:37:21PM +0200, Valentin Micic wrote:
> > > > > > > > In what way is it useful to dispatch messages from the
> > > > > > > > driver level onto a PID dedicated for a streams if
> > > > > > > > you do not get flow control per stream?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not sure if it would be useful, and not sure if that is what I've
> > > > been
> > > > > > > trying to say/ask. Forget about my "stream processor" (*)
> > suggestion,
> > > > it
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > irrelevant, and I prefer the implementation at the driver level
> > > > anyway.
> > > > > > > I was only wondering if there is a way to achieve a stream
> > separation
> > > > > > > without utilizing additional file descriptors. I think yes, but
> > the
> > > > > > driver
> > > > > > > may end up too complex and difficult to maintain, etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If it is useful it may be worth the complexification...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But I am now under the assumption that a stream separation
> > > > > > that does not utilize additional file descriptors
> > > > > > (as you ask for) can not do per-stream flow control
> > > > > > (with respect to remote peer) and therefore is not useful.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Prove me wrong and I might do it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would be very grateful if you implement this feature whichever
> > way
> > > > you
> > > > > > > find fit :-).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BR
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > V.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (*) I did say that stream processor can do queuing, though. This
> > > > would
> > > > > > imply
> > > > > > > some basic flow control vis-à-vis target PID, but not necessarily
> > > > with
> > > > > > > respect to remote peer. :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > erlang-questions mailing list
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > --Hynek (Pichi) Vychodil
> > > > >
> > > > > Analyze your data in minutes. Share your insights instantly. Thrill
> > your
> > > > > boss.  Be a data hero!
> > > > > Try Good Data now for free: www.gooddata.com
> > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > erlang-questions mailing list
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --Hynek (Pichi) Vychodil
> > >
> > > Analyze your data in minutes. Share your insights instantly. Thrill your
> > > boss.  Be a data hero!
> > > Try Good Data now for free: www.gooddata.com
> >
> > --
> >
> > / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --Hynek (Pichi) Vychodil
> 
> Analyze your data in minutes. Share your insights instantly. Thrill your
> boss.  Be a data hero!
> Try Good Data now for free: www.gooddata.com

-- 

/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list