[erlang-questions] eep: multiple patterns
Fri May 23 13:24:26 CEST 2008
2008/5/23 Mats Cronqvist <>:
> Robert Virding wrote:
>> I don't have a problem with this, but I don't really see the need. The
>> only time I have had repeated bodies they have been very simple no repeating
>> just them has been very straight forward.
> i read the above as "i've never needed this myself, so it must be
> let me assure you that there are major telecom equipment vendors whose
> code bases would benefit greatly from this syntax.
No, I meant my comment literally. It is not a problem that *I* have had so
*I* don't see the need. If others have trouble with this then *they* see the
need. So be it.
I accept the suggestion. But allowing = in guards really makes it
In your example it could actually only be used in 1 place.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions