<div class="gmail_quote">2008/5/23 Mats Cronqvist <<a href="mailto:mats.cronqvist@gmail.com">mats.cronqvist@gmail.com</a>>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Robert Virding wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="Ih2E3d"><br></div></blockquote><div class="Ih2E3d"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I don't have a problem with this, but I don't really see the need. The only time I have had repeated bodies they have been very simple no repeating just them has been very straight forward.<br>
</blockquote></div>
[...]<br>
<br>
i read the above as "i've never needed this myself, so it must be unnecessary."<br>
let me assure you that there are major telecom equipment vendors whose code bases would benefit greatly from this syntax.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>No, I meant my comment literally. It is not a problem that *I* have had so *I* don't see the need. If others have trouble with this then *they* see the need. So be it.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I accept the suggestion. But allowing = in guards really makes it unnecessary.</div><div><br></div><div>In your example it could actually only be used in 1 place.</div><div><br></div><div>Robert</div><div>
<br></div></div>