[erlang-questions] Ideas for a new Erlang
Fri Jun 27 11:22:24 CEST 2008
Sven-Olof Nystr|m wrote:
> Well, that was never the main problem. Selective receive is complex
> and unnecessary.
over the years i've worked with perhaps 300 erlang programmers,
pretty much all of which have been less accomplished computer scientists
than Sven-Olof. and there are many things in Erlang that they've found
complex, unnecessary, or both. the syntax, higher order functions, list
comprehensions, recursion, bignums... pretty much everything in Erlang/OTP.
everything, that is, except two things; selective receive and hot code
loading. i can't think of anyone that has found these two things complex
now Sven-Olof is obviously entitled to his opinion about the meaning of
complexity. but i think it's a fact that there is no great demand for a
change in semantics of selective receive.
More information about the erlang-questions