[erlang-questions] I want documentation of Erlang in EDoc format
Tue Sep 18 13:04:58 CEST 2007
On 2007-09-05, Richard Carlsson <> wrote:
> and it is probably not worth the time and effort to move it into the
> source files.
That seems reasonable. But it would be nice to have the type
information available to enable tools like dialyzer to check
implementation against spec where appropriate. Even if you think actually
giving type signatures for functions is too much work for not enough
benefit, having the types defined so that everyone used the same ones
in their own documentation, would be very helpful.
More information about the erlang-questions