[erlang-questions] Stand Alone Erlang or Equivalent
Wed Sep 5 06:24:28 CEST 2007
I am interested in this, yes. Does it require an installation of erlang
to be present or is it "self contained" (i.e. you send the
self-extracting/self-running archive and it does the rest)?
SAE (discontinued since R9 I believe) has the best implementation I have
seen, with the single file being all that was required in order to run
an Erlang application/server. If Joe were ever to get this back into
working order - he would have many grateful fans (over and above those
of his book *grin*)
Bengt Kleberg wrote:
> It is easy to load a beam file from non-file based sources. i have a
> self-extracting-and-run-archive (i call it besea) that uses escript, if
> you are interested.
> Those were the days...
> EPO guidelines 1978: "If the contribution to the known art resides
> solely in a computer program then the subject matter is not
> patentable in whatever manner it may be presented in the claims."
> On 2007-09-04 10:54, Chandru wrote:
>> On 04/09/07, Benjamin Tolputt <> wrote:
>>> So I was wondering if I could impress them with some news on the Stand
>>> Alone Erlang front. In a related question, how easy is it to retrieve
>>> code/beams from non-file based sources (e.g. from an embedded native
>>> code database or zip file)?
>> code:load_binary/3 lets you load a module using a binary blob. This
>> might be useful.
>> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions