[erlang-questions] Surprising conclusion in Parallel programming environments: less is more?
Garry Hodgson
garry@REDACTED
Thu Oct 4 20:30:54 CEST 2007
ok <ok@REDACTED> wrote:
> That article basically says:
> (fact) if you give people too many kinds of jam to choose from,
> they will choose less jam. (All the examples of this kind
> presented in the article are about people's PURCHASING
> decisions.)
> (wild extrapolation) there are already too many parallel programming
> languages and approaches.
> (extreme flight into fantasy) we should use an existing language
> rather than one designed for parallelism.
if, indeed, there are too many languages, it's not because we make
up new ones, but because we never retire old ones.
----
Garry Hodgson, Senior Software Geek, AT&T CSO
nobody can do everything, but everybody can do something.
do something.
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list