[erlang-questions] : Subtle behaviour of Erlang scheduler
Wed May 30 15:02:37 CEST 2007
Rickard Green wrote:
> Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) wrote:
>> (*) Of course, the recommendation has always been to
>> regard the scheduler as preemptive, and expect your code to be
>> preemptable whenever possible (that is,
>> between any two operations), so in that sense, SMP
>> merely makes good on this promise. (:
> Yes. We have also introduced the +M command-line flag, in order to try
> to make it easier to find bugs in Erlang code that doesn't follow those
Sorry, it should be +T command-line flag.
Rickard Green, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB.
More information about the erlang-questions