[erlang-questions] some language changes

Bengt Kleberg <>
Wed May 23 17:47:26 CEST 2007


On 2007-05-23 16:39, Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) wrote:
...deleted
> One problem is that epp is not willing to take 
> just a stream of bytes (this has been discussed
> before on this list), but desperately wants to 
> read a regular file.

if epp (and others that desperately want a file) also handled an IO 
object (as returned from file:open/2) the problem would go away. i would 
expect epp to use file:open/2 on the file and then the IO object in the 
rest of the code so the change would not be great.

unless epp does a file:read_file/1 to get all of the file into memory, 
of course. then epp should be able to handle a binary instead of a file 
with out any great change.


bengt
-- 
Those were the days...
    EPO guidelines 1978: "If the contribution to the known art resides
    solely in a computer program then the subject matter is not
    patentable in whatever manner it may be presented in the claims."



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list