[erlang-questions] On using Mnesia to pass data

[Bob Ippolito]

It may be worth looking at http://www.rabbitmq.com/ ... but that could
be more overkill than mnesia.

-bob

On 3/6/07, Ludovic Coquelle <lcoquelle@REDACTED> wrote:
> (re-post some exchange I forgot to copy to the list)
>
> Thanks, most of my current knowledge is based on a lot of "2 cents" ... so I
> always enjoy to got some more! :)
>
> I understand that slave can write in the remote table of master.
> But my point was that there will be some overhead due to mnesia to share all
> the schema/actions between master and slaves. I don't care about schema/data
> exchange between master and one slave, but I wonder if mnesia has to make
> connection between all slaves to know who is writing what, when, where ...
>
> On 3/7/07, t ty <tty.erlang@REDACTED> wrote:
> > You do not have to replicate the data. Is possible to have the slave
> > see the data as a remote table. In this case the data from one slave
> > isn't propagated to the other slaves.
> >
> > Overall I would consider mnesia overkill for your needs. But thats
> > just my 2 cents.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > t
> >
> >
> > On 3/6/07, Ludovic Coquelle <lcoquelle@REDACTED> wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > I would like some advice on "using mnesia or not".
> > >
> > > The problem I try to solve: A master node run some processes on slave
> nodes,
> > > and gather results of all those processes (master needs to know/admin
> which
> > > process is start on which slave node; the context is a small
> load-testing
> > > tool I am writing mostly to learn Erlang/OTP).
> > >
> > > Current implementation is fairly simple/direct: Master start the
> processes
> > > on slaves, and wait that the slaves send back results.
> > >
> > > Looks like using mnesia could give me another implementation to solve
> the
> > > problem: slave write data to mnesia, master read mnesia.
> > > Is it a "good idea" to use mnesia only for data transfer? (don't care
> for
> > > now that master will have to store data in some db, it's another issue)
> > >
> > > Advantage I see to mnesia is that I don't have to manage all cases where
> > > slave failed before the end, send half the data only, send all data once
> or
> > > piece by piece...
> > > Drawback is maybe efficiency: master and all the slaves will share all
> the
> > > data, where I only need a data transfer from slave->master ... looks
> like
> > > mnesia will do more than what I need: am I in such a case where "when
> you
> > > have a hammer everything looks like a nail"?
> > >
> > > Any thought?
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > erlang-questions mailing list
> > > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > > http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>