[erlang-questions] Stand Alone Erlang Still Updated?
Tue Jul 31 15:22:01 CEST 2007
Peter Chan wrote:
> I would put my vote in a native executable too. CEAN is very nice for
> managing all the dependencies, but when deployed to the target system,
> it is still a big pile of directories.
> I took the earlier suggestion and looked at Wings3D, and I really like
> how minimal and straightforward the Wings3D distribution is. CEAN is
> great for package management, but the myriad files are still confusing
> me, who is a novice.
> Looking at it, SAE would seems to be the ideal deployment form. It
> be nice to see SAE updated for current Erlang, or somehow be able to
> compile a CEAN to a SAE (with only a .exe, a few .dll, and a .zip).
Yep, that's pretty much what I'm hoping for. A comparable model (sort
of) comes from the Ruby world... Ruby Gems are kind of like CEAN, and
there's a tool RubyScript2Exe that can generate the executable and
associated support files. [I haven't personally used this, just know it
Another, slightly-different model is from the Lisp world, where (for
example) SBCL has (sb-ext:save-lisp-and-die ... :executable t ...) that
saves things as they are.
OTOH, dealing with updates and hot code replacement may be a much larger
problem without a "pile of directories and BEAM files".
I also need to go back and look at the Wings3D code... it's been a while
since I poked at it.
The end goal, as I see it, is the ability to produce a complete
installable application that can be dealt with by a normal consumer-type
More information about the erlang-questions