[erlang-questions] [Q]: Terminating supervisor and its workers
Lennart Öhman
Lennart.Ohman@REDACTED
Wed Jul 25 17:35:29 CEST 2007
Hi,
have you turned trap_exit to true in your worker?
A gen_server process does not automatically start trapping exits
and will therefore of course respond immediately to an exit signal
from its supervisor (an exit signal other than normal that is) unless
trapping exits.
Best Regards
Lennart
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lennart Öhman phone: +46 8 587 623 27
Sjöland & Thyselius Telecom AB cell : +46 70 552 6735
Hälsingegatan 43, 10th floor fax : +46 8 667 8230
SE-113 31 STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN email: lennart.ohman@REDACTED
-----Original Message-----
From: erlang-questions-bounces@REDACTED [mailto:erlang-questions-bounces@REDACTED] On Behalf Of Ladislav Lenart
Sent: den 25 juli 2007 16:08
To: Erlang-Questions (E-mail)
Subject: [erlang-questions] [Q]: Terminating supervisor and its workers
Hello,
I have a supervisor that has one worker child (a gen_server) which has an ODBC session to a database. When I terminate the supervisor by evaluating exit(Sup, shutdown), ODBC session terminates with error saying that its client (my worker) was terminated "abnormally".
I thought that exit(Sup, shutdown) is the proper (normal) way how to gracefully terminate a supervision tree, meaning that gen_server terminate/2 callback function of my worker will be called...
So my question is, how to terminate a supervision tree so that a worker has a chance to clean up after itself?
Thanks,
Ladislav Lenart
_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list
erlang-questions@REDACTED
http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list