[erlang-questions] The meaning of OTP...

David Mercer <>
Wed Jul 18 16:20:23 CEST 2007


Igwan wrote:
> To the contrary, I think people have an idea of robustness and 
> reliability when they think of telecoms (the good old and always working 
> PSTN phone lines as opposed to the big unreliable internet :) and in the 
> mind of programmers you can add fault-tolerance and distribution they 
> 've been dreaming about all of their career :) Coming from the telecom 
> industry my objectiveness may be flawed here :) , but IMAO, Erlang 
> should not dismiss its telecom heritage, it's all but a turn-off.

I agree completely.  I do not come from a telecom background, but when I
found out that OTP is related to the running of telephone networks, I
immediately thought of how reliable telephone networks are (when was the
last time you were kicked off a telephone call because the entire telephone
system had to be rebooted?) and how this might be a viable choice for my
nontelecoms applications.

I do not think it should be changed to Open Transaction Platform, because
all that is doing is replacing the only meaningful word in the acronym with
a buzzword, making the term completely meaningless.  Not only that, OTP has
nothing to do with transactions, so it is not only meaningless, but also
deceptive.

Cheers,

DBM




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list