[erlang-questions] avoid -import. Why?
Mon Jul 9 00:21:19 CEST 2007
Anthony Kong wrote:
> Hi, all,
> In reading this resource (
> ), I found this statement,
> Don't use -import, using it makes the code harder to read since you
> cannot directly see in what module a function is defined. Use exref
> (Cross Reference Tool) to find module dependencies.
> I do not think I understand why it is the case, and could not find the
> tool exref from the erlang distribution.
> If anyone can shed some light, most appreciate.
Different people might give you different answers to this question.
Below are mine:
1. In general, I do not like imports because they obscure they
syntactic distinction of local vs. remote function calls.
In Erlang, local function calls are of the form f(...) while
remote ones of the form m:f(...). With imports even remote
function calls look of the form f(...)
(I believe this is what the above statement is in the manual is
2. Occasionally, I want to find all calls to a function m:f/a and for
that I use 'grep'. Because of #1, there is no convenient one liner
that can give me the places of all these calls.
Btw, the reference to the "exref" tool is most probably a reference ro
More information about the erlang-questions