[erlang-questions] xmerl still slow?

Torbjorn Tornkvist <>
Wed Jan 31 13:28:45 CET 2007


An alternative to xmerl may be: erlsom.

--Tobbe

Joel Reymont wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> I stumbled upon a thread from '05 that mentions eXpat having 5 times  
> the performance of xmerl.
> 
> Is xmerl still considered slow? Have there been any improvements over  
> the past couple of years?
> 
> I like the template engine at http://dev.hyperstruct.net/seethrough/  
> since it does not include any erlang code in the template itself. The  
> project uses xmerl, thus my asking.
> 
> 	Thanks, Joel
> 
> --
> http://wagerlabs.com/
> 
> 
> 




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list