[erlang-questions] Programming question
Wed Jan 24 20:01:45 CET 2007
On 24 Jan 2007, at 18:50, Claes Wikstrom wrote:
> Sean Hinde wrote:
>> One fix might be for gen:call() to issue another exit signal
>> towards the calling process after returning the result.
> Uhhh I wonder how much code would break by that. Quite a lot.
Are you sure? The two processes are linked, so presumably the caller
wants to receive exit signals. Indeed the caller will always receive
an 'EXIT' signal whenever the linked process dies, *except* if it
dies while handling a call from the caller which is wrapped in a catch.
Seems to me that if there is a backwards compatibilty issue, it is
that other bugs are hidden by this behaviour which are just waiting
More information about the erlang-questions