[erlang-questions] Erlang vs. Stackless Python

Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) <>
Fri Aug 3 19:15:06 CEST 2007


 
Zac Brown wrote:
> 
> The reason for that is that its not really even a parallel 
> test since there's only one process running at a time so 
> you're just making one big line, that could easily be 
> accomplished by one process constantly talking to itself. 
> Dumb way to show erlang's power if you ask me :).

Well, it does illustrate the cost of spawning and 
the cost of message passing, and how the cost depends
on the number of concurrent processes.

It's been a while since I looked at Stackless Python,
but I believe its "processes" are not quite as 
capable as Erlang processes, esp. in terms of fault
tolerance and debug support. By all rights, they should
be cheaper than Erlang processes...

BR,
Ulf W



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list