[erlang-questions] : Package Support/Use

Raimo Niskanen <>
Fri Nov 3 09:38:05 CET 2006


Can someone explain this eiffel solution, that many deem better...



On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 07:22:48AM +0100, Bengt Kleberg wrote:
> On 2006-11-02 18:51, Chandru wrote:
> ...deleted
> > one of our module names clash with one of OTP's module names. We renamed 
> > our module and the problem disappeared. This is once in 7 years. As 
> 
> otp is in the standard distribution. packages will help reducing module 
> name clashes between third party products. the kind where A and B spend 
> 7 years developing, and C wants to use both their products.
> 
> if possible to adopt to erlng, the eiffel solution is better. imho.
> 
> 
> bengt
> -- 
>     EPO guidelines 1978: "If the contribution to the known art resides
>     solely in a computer program then the subject matter is not
>     patentable in whatever manner it may be presented in the claims."
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

-- 

/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list