Longstanding issues: structs & standalone Erlang

Bengt Kleberg <>
Thu Mar 2 07:58:14 CET 2006


On 2006-02-23 09:14, Vlad Dumitrescu XX (LN/EAB) wrote:
...deleted
> I found an interesting tool for Java, called Macker
> (http://innig.net/macker/), that I think would be nice to translate to
> any language. The idea is to define the architecture in a file and let
> the tool check if the code is structured accordingly or not, spitting
> out errors and warnings. 

do you think it is ''better'' to have the rules arranged after 
allow/deny at the top level, or after modules at the top?


bengt




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list