Thu Jan 5 13:44:23 CET 2006
granted. but what if you see something funny in the log, and the target node
is still up? then you'd want to connect to is and do a process_info() or
Joel Reymont wrote:
> It's not worthless if I'm just using it for tracking. All I want to do
> in the end is say "give me all the entries from this process" and
> supply the process id.
> If erlang:phash2 gives a unique number for each pid then maybe I can
> use pid hashes to identify processes in the disk log instead of the
> pids themselves.
> What do you think?
> On Jan 5, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Mats Cronqvist wrote:
>> well, the node id number in the pid is worthless for logging
>> (numbering is different on each erlang node).
More information about the erlang-questions