[erlang-questions] Changing scheduler behaviour to make tests less deterministic

Rickard Green rickard.s.green@REDACTED
Wed Dec 27 23:25:10 CET 2006

As of R11B-3 there will be a "modified timing" command line argument
to erl (+T). It will be possible to modify the timing more or less.
It will (most likely) do the following:

* spawn/spawn_link/spawn_opt will schedule out the parent process
   and with "heavier modified timing" force the parent to sleep
   for a while. (Among the few SMP bugs we have found in our Erlang
   code, most of them have been bugs where the code depended on the
   parent doing some initialization before the child began
* A fixed amount of reductions will be bumped as soon as a process
   is scheduled in.

Rickard Green, Erlang/OTP

Chris Newcombe wrote:
> I have some unit tests which run in a single Erlang node but which are
> internally concurrent -- i.e. they test subsystems that spawn multiple
> processes and interact with each other.
> As the current BEAM scheduler is based on #reductions consumed, my
> tests are quite deterministic.
> The tests are not _entirely_ deterministic as they use my Berkeley DB
> driver, which makes system IO calls in private threadpools before
> sending replies back to Erlang, so that injects some degree of
> unpredictability into 'receive' times. And even that limited degree of
> non-determinism has uncovered one or two concurrency-related bugs,
> e.g. incorrect handling of out-of-order messages, poor choice of
> timeouts on receives, etc.
> So to achieve more coverage of concurrency-interactions in the tests,
> I want to make a cheap, easy hack to the BEAM scheduler to make it
> less ploddingly deterministic on every test run.
> One trivial way would be to use "erl -smp enable +S 2" (or more), to
> introduce more OS threads running Erlang processes.  But paradoxically
> that introduces some 'relatively uncontrolable' determinism (the OS
> scheduler), which could indeed find some concurrency-sensitive bugs,
> but might make them harder to reproduce (to verify fixes).
> I'd prefer to introduce some more controlable determinism, e.g. by
> changing the size of the process quantum (the number of reductions it
> is allowed execute before it is pre-empted).
> Obviously we need to be careful to preserve fairness, avoid thrash etc.
> The first basic test would be to change this to a different constant
> for all processes.  The current value is 2000 reductions, so we might
> try running tests with values of 500, 1000, 1500, 3000.   Actually, I
> want to put a loop around the test driver and try a large range of
> values with fairly small increments.)
> Unfortunately the setting is a compile-time constant in a header file
> (see below)
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_vm.h:#define CONTEXT_REDS 2000   /* Swap
> process out after this number */
> I'd really like to avoid building multiple versions of the emulator,
> and instead override CONTEXT_REDS from an environment variable at
> startup.
> The next step might be to make this a per-process value, settable via
> spawn_opt() -- like heap_size, or fullsweep_after.  This would give a
> different form of process 'priorization' than the current
> high/medium/low, and which might even have interesting uses in
> production.
> But I'd like to try the simple approach first.
> My questions:
>   1. Does anyone on the BEAM team envisage problems if I change the
> #define of CONTEXT_REDS to a reference to a global variable, which I
> initialize from an environment variable at some suitably early point?
>       (I've done basic research, and #1 looks feasible to me -- see
> below.  But I just want to check I'm not missing something subtle.)
>   2. Does anyone see a better way to achieve the goal?
>   3. Is the 'reductions_per_quantum' parameter for spawn_opt feasible?
>  Interesting?  Or too dangerous (risking starvation) to be worth it?
> Many thanks,
> Chris
> CONTEXT_REDS is not used in many places:
> 	% cd erlang/otp_src_R11B-2
> 	% grep REDUCTIONS ***/*.h
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_vm.h:#define INPUT_REDUCTIONS (2 * CONTEXT_REDS)
> 	% grep CONTEXT_REDS ***/*.h
> 	erts/emulator/beam/bif.h:       (p)->fcalls = -CONTEXT_REDS;            \
> 	erts/emulator/beam/bif.h:       else if ((p)->fcalls < -CONTEXT_REDS)      \
> 	erts/emulator/beam/bif.h:           (p)->fcalls = -CONTEXT_REDS;           \
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_vm.h:#define CONTEXT_REDS 2000   /* Swap
> process out after this number */
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_vm.h:#define INPUT_REDUCTIONS (2 * CONTEXT_REDS)
> (The references in bif.h are for macros called BUMP_REDS() and BUMP_ALL_REDS())
> CONTEXT_REDS creeps into ETS code (erl_db.c) and even lists:member()
> and lists:keysearch(), apparently to limit the amount of work they do
> in a slot.
> 	% grep CONTEXT_REDS ***/*.c
> 	erts/emulator/beam/bif.c:        BIF_RET2(old_value, CONTEXT_REDS);
> 	erts/emulator/beam/bif.c:    if (reds > CONTEXT_REDS) {
> 	erts/emulator/beam/bif.c:        reds = CONTEXT_REDS;
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_bif_lists.c:    int max_iter = 10 * CONTEXT_REDS;
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_bif_lists.c:         BIF_RET2(am_true,
> CONTEXT_REDS - max_iter/10);
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_bif_lists.c:    BIF_RET2(am_false,
> CONTEXT_REDS - max_iter/10);
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_bif_lists.c:    max_iter = CONTEXT_REDS * 40;
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_bif_lists.c:    int max_iter = 10 * CONTEXT_REDS;
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_db.c:    if (++i > CONTEXT_REDS) {
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_db_tree.c:    int max_iter = CONTEXT_REDS * 10;
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_db_tree.c:    BUMP_REDS(p,CONTEXT_REDS - max_iter / 10);
> 	erts/emulator/beam/erl_process.c:       calls = CONTEXT_REDS;
> The main use is in erl_process.c:
>  * schedule() is called from BEAM (process_main()) or HiPE
>  * (hipe_mode_switch()) when the current process is to be
>  * replaced by a new process. 'calls' is the number of reduction
>  * steps the current process consumed.
>  * schedule() returns the new process, and the new process'
>  * ->fcalls field is initialised with its allowable number of
>  * reduction steps.
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list