[erlang-questions] Introspecting the atom table
Michael McDaniel
erlangx@REDACTED
Thu Dec 21 05:21:05 CET 2006
Aha, thank you for the question and the answer. I have a few
places in my code to change the try/catch I've been using. I
do not remember where/when I started thinking new atoms would
be created and changed my code from simple list_to_atom funs.
~M
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:41:27PM -0500, Yariv Sadan wrote:
> Do repeated calls to list_to_atom(Str) with the same Str value
> actually create new atoms, or does list_to_atom() check if the atom
> already exists? (I thought it was the latter)
>
> Yariv
>
> > My understanding is that "an atom is forever". In long running
> > code I don't want to keep creating new atoms if I already have
> > one. The above I use where I have sporadic communication between
> > remote servers that could come online or offline.
> >
> > This was one example where I might not want to keep creating new
> > atoms so use the try/catch idiom.
> >
> > ~M
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> >
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
> !DSPAM:52,4589d85218341742597741!
>
>
--
Michael McDaniel
Portland, Oregon, USA
http://autosys.us
+1 503 283 5284
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list