[erlang-questions] Introspecting the atom table
Thu Dec 21 05:23:39 CET 2006
Aha, thank you for the question and the answer. I have a few
places in my code to change the try/catch I've been using. I
do not remember where/when I started thinking new atoms would
be created and changed my code from simple list_to_atom funs.
(had a bit of email problem, pasted answer on wrong msg before!)
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:37:33AM +0100, Robert Virding wrote:
> It checks if the atom exists, you can only have 1 copy of an atom!
> That's why testing them equality is so fast.
> Yariv Sadan wrote:
> > Do repeated calls to list_to_atom(Str) with the same Str value
> > actually create new atoms, or does list_to_atom() check if the atom
> > already exists? (I thought it was the latter)
> > Yariv
> >> My understanding is that "an atom is forever". In long running
> >> code I don't want to keep creating new atoms if I already have
> >> one. The above I use where I have sporadic communication between
> >> remote servers that could come online or offline.
> >> This was one example where I might not want to keep creating new
> >> atoms so use the try/catch idiom.
> >>erlang-questions mailing list
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> erlang-questions mailing list
Portland, Oregon, USA
+1 503 283 5284
More information about the erlang-questions