[erlang-questions] Why is Erlang what it is?

[Kirill Zaborski]

On 12/14/06, Mats Cronqvist <mats.cronqvist@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> (*) i'm not talking about wadlers (or any other) type system in
> particular.
> but a few years ago i did a study on erlang-related bug reports in our
> live
> product. the conclusion was that once we get to system test, we find
> essentially
> no more type-related bugs (**).
> www.erlang.se/workshop/2004/matsbilder.pdf


I've seen this paper and maybe 1 line about typing was too short to remember
:)

(**) running dialyzer on well-tested code will turn up tons of errors. alas,
> that almost always turns out to be dead code.


I'll dedicate more time for Dialyzer, thanx

_______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20061214/56a34766/attachment.htm>