TCP stack throughput
Tue Jul 5 00:17:52 CEST 2005
I ran your C server and I should say that I'm very unhappy with the
results. Unhappy for Erlang that is. The test runs about twice as
fast and I don't get any connection resets running 1000 simultaneous
connections on Mac OSX 10.4.1.
Granted, I get 0 as the factorial result and the C calculation is
probably way more optimized than the Erlang one but you can still
connect at least 2 times as many clients as we managed to connect
with Erlang on Solaris and 3 times the number I managed to connect
I invite everyone to run the test and experience the difference.
On Jul 4, 2005, at 11:34 PM, Matthias Lang wrote:
> I'm with Mickael.
> Your results could be interpreted as showing one _or more_ of the
> a) That your test client is the bottleneck
> b) That your test server is the bottleneck
> c) That the OS/tcp stack isn't really designed for the sort of
> use you're testing.
More information about the erlang-questions