standalone erlang
Joe Armstrong (AL/EAB)
joe.armstrong@REDACTED
Wed Feb 16 16:22:49 CET 2005
SAE has a long history.
As far as I know it is currently broken.
It has actually worked for windows (once) - and I had a pure
Erlang program that could make a windows executable on any
Erlang box.
To do this I had to reverse engineer the Microsoft COFF format
which took me two weeks and was painful :-(
Unfortunately this has never made it to the main release and
porting it to each new release so painful that I don't want to do this
anymore.
When I ran a series of experiments on planet lab I wanted to install
Erlang on a few hundred nodes - to do this I made a minimal release
- basically install OTP then run a shell script to remove all unnecessary
sources, then retain only the beam code in stdlib, kernel and compiler
and then make some scripts to pack/unpack and relocate everything.
This is not "stand-alone" but does reduce the total number of files
needed significantly.
/Joe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-erlang-questions@REDACTED
> [mailto:owner-erlang-questions@REDACTED]On Behalf Of James Hague
> Sent: den 16 februari 2005 15:26
> To: Luke Gorrie
> Cc: erlang-questions@REDACTED
> Subject: Re: standalone erlang
>
>
> > IIRC they only wanted a windows version. :-)
>
> I tell you, if SAE worked for Windows, I'd immediately begin using it
> for a whole bunch of utilities. As it stands, it's a big pain to give
> them to other people, so I end up writing 'em in Perl or whatnot
> (there are several tools for wrapping up Perl scripts into standalone
> programs).
>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list