Documentation Search Path Patches

[Bjorn Gustavsson]

Brent Fulgham <bfulg@REDACTED> writes:
[...]
> What was wrong with it? (I ask in the hope that I can
> learn from the mistake!)

Some of the documentation paths were still incorrect because
they used code:priv_dir/1 instead of code:lib_dir/1; also
there were extra semicolons in the case in tool_util.erl
which gave "syntax error" from the compiler.

> 
> 
> What about the run_erl.c patch needed for
> FreeBSD/MacOS X? 
> (http://www.erlang.org/ml-archive/erlang-questions/200412/msg00061.html)
> It would be nice to have that change as well.

My plan is to change mknod() to mkfifo() unconditionally; as far as I know only
ancient Unices don't have mkfifo().

/Bjorn
-- 
Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB