Documentation Search Path Patches
Thu Feb 3 10:52:56 CET 2005
Brent Fulgham <bfulg@REDACTED> writes:
> What was wrong with it? (I ask in the hope that I can
> learn from the mistake!)
Some of the documentation paths were still incorrect because
they used code:priv_dir/1 instead of code:lib_dir/1; also
there were extra semicolons in the case in tool_util.erl
which gave "syntax error" from the compiler.
> What about the run_erl.c patch needed for
> FreeBSD/MacOS X?
> It would be nice to have that change as well.
My plan is to change mknod() to mkfifo() unconditionally; as far as I know only
ancient Unices don't have mkfifo().
Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
More information about the erlang-questions