The Great Computer Language Shootout is back
Tue Jul 27 18:30:23 CEST 2004
--- Vance Shipley <> wrote:
> Nothing really, however the test was of exception handling and my
> version handles real exceptions in an Erlangish way.
So how about a version that handles real exceptions in an Erlangish
way, and uses the process dictionary for the artificial counting
required by this silly test. (Or just clean-up and contribute the
Erlangish version - it's not that much slower.)
>>I was tempted to use the process dictionary for the hash tests too
> Using the process dictionary is cheating.
Yes, the old Erlang book was clear on that point.
best wishes, Isaac
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the erlang-questions