The Great Computer Language Shootout is back
Isaac Gouy
igouy2@REDACTED
Tue Jul 27 18:30:23 CEST 2004
--- Vance Shipley <vances@REDACTED> wrote:
> Nothing really, however the test was of exception handling and my
> version handles real exceptions in an Erlangish way.
So how about a version that handles real exceptions in an Erlangish
way, and uses the process dictionary for the artificial counting
required by this silly test. (Or just clean-up and contribute the
Erlangish version - it's not that much slower.)
>>I was tempted to use the process dictionary for the hash tests too
;-)
> Using the process dictionary is cheating.
Yes, the old Erlang book was clear on that point.
best wishes, Isaac
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list