Megaco over UDP/IP?
Thu Feb 26 13:22:09 CET 2004
I have, and I've encountered no problems. I've even found that there is a significant performance advantage when using UDP instead of TCP. The Megaco protocol handles retransmission, and makes TCP connection oriented transport somewhat redundant, hence the performance gain with UDP. However there may be a need to use TCP if the megaco transaction packets become larger than the MTU.
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:00:59 +0100 (MET)
Chris Williams <> wrote:
> Has any one used the Erlang Megaco(H.248) stack for
> transport over UDP/IP?
> If so did you have any problems running Megaco over UDP/IP?
> We here at AXD have run Megaco over ATM, SCTP/IP and TCP/IP
> and considering to run Megaco over UDP/IP for certain
> Access Gateways.
> Running Megaco over ATM and SCTP works fine.....
> This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you believe this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you.
> E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interruption, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof.
"The Tao of Programming
flows far away
on the wind of morning."
More information about the erlang-questions