Higher order receieve anybody
Tue Feb 24 15:23:21 CET 2004
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:11:46 +0100, Tony Rogvall <tony@REDACTED> wrote:
> One idea (tested and implemented) is to use a primitive
> erlang:signal(Pid,Sig, Info) to send a primitive form of messages. For
> example message passing could be implemented as erlang:signal(Pid,
> 'MESSAGE', Message). In Multi Pro Erlang we did the signal dispatcher in
> C code. In retrospect we should have implemented
> a signal dispatcher / signal_handler in Erlang. This way
> all signals (including messages) would be processed by Erlang code. Then
> one could implement the link semantics and message reception etc in
> Erlang code!
> The signal handler should be called in the context of the receiving
> process with some kind of interrupt semantics (when it comes to receive).
> handle_signal(From, 'MESSAGE', Message) ->
> handle_signal(From, 'LINK', _) ->
Very nice! (:
Ulf Wiger, Senior System Architect
This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you believe this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you.
E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interruption, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof.
More information about the erlang-questions