So now all I'd like in Erlang is...
Fri Feb 20 03:48:19 CET 2004
Chris Pressey <> wrote:
> how do you deal with forward references?
Uh. Right. Forgot about that.
> I guess what I'm saying is that it *would* be more orthogonal to have
> all functions as funs, but even if we did, it probably wouldn't be long
> before something like foo() -> bar was introduced as a shorthand for
> Foo = fun() -> bar end, register(foo, Foo) anyway.
You are definately right there.
Nice try on my part, but quite a bad idea. :)
More information about the erlang-questions