Use-defined guard (was: RE: Enhanced type guard syntax])

Sven-Olof Nystr|m <>
Mon Sep 22 17:05:42 CEST 2003


Sean Hinde writes:
 > 
 > On Monday, September 22, 2003, at 06:21  am, Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
 > > Except for the unnecessarily ugly syntax and not being quite as fully
 > > worked out, how is this different from my old "Abstract Patterns" 
 > > proposal?

 > I can't seem to find this proposal online. Link anyone?

I have a copy. I could post it on the list, if Richard does not have
any objections.


Sven-Olof





More information about the erlang-questions mailing list