Tue Oct 21 20:56:40 CEST 2003
Luke Gorrie <luke@REDACTED> writes:
> "Richard Carlsson" <richardc@REDACTED> writes:
> > The current status is that it turned out that Erlang's scoping rules
> > made it harder than we had expected to implement "cond" correctly
> > (i.e., it's not just a trivial expansion into a nested case
> > statement), so it was postponed until someone with a lot of spare time
> > could have another look at it.
> Just add `let' too.
Hmm, but Core Erlang already has `let'. Is the problem that you can't
express cond in Core Erlang, or that you have to do something hard
with it before it gets to Core? Or something else?
More information about the erlang-questions