Tue Oct 21 20:49:44 CEST 2003
"Richard Carlsson" <richardc@REDACTED> writes:
> The current status is that it turned out that Erlang's scoping rules
> made it harder than we had expected to implement "cond" correctly
> (i.e., it's not just a trivial expansion into a nested case
> statement), so it was postponed until someone with a lot of spare time
> could have another look at it.
Just add `let' too.
More information about the erlang-questions