new syntax - a provocation
Robert Virding
robert.virding@REDACTED
Sat Oct 18 23:55:05 CEST 2003
---- Original Message -----
From: "Richard A. O'Keefe" <ok@REDACTED>
To: <erlang-questions@REDACTED>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: new syntax - a provocation
> Perhaps I should also point to the "logix" implementation
> of Flat Concurrent Prolog. I never actually looked inside, but
> my understanding was that atoms were implemented basically as free-
> floating strings, with the added wrinkle that if two atoms were
> compared and found to be equal, references to one were changed to
> be references to the other. (Just _which_ references and just _how_
> they were found escape my memory. I thought I had a copy of logix
> on an old file system, but it was a shell script pointing to an
> installation in Melbourne.)
The implementation of Strand (another flat concurrent logic language)
did the same.
Robert
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list