problem with shared heap?
Thu Mar 6 12:24:10 CET 2003
david wallin writes:
> Yes, but when shared heap is finished, will there be cases when running
> a shared heap will actually perform worse than without it, or is it just
> now in its experimental stages that these things can occur?
Why would you expect the shared heap to be faster in _all_ cases?
* Native code is not necessarily faster than BEAM.
* Binaries are not always faster than lists.
* Tail recursive algorithms are not always faster than non-tail
More information about the erlang-questions