Documenting the Language
Marc Ernst Eddy van Woerkom
Tue Mar 4 15:19:53 CET 2003
> There really does need to be a document which definetivly
> decribes the core langauge. Now I know there is the
> "Reference Manual" but it is dated February 9, 1999 and is
> "DRAFT (0.7)". It's the Erlang 4.7.3 reference manual and
> we're currently on 5.2.
That baffled me as well.
How is the language defined? (Except as commented source code of the compiler :-)
And it looks bad, if both the standard book and the reference doc
> It's also only available as a
> postscript file and I haven't had any luck text searching it.
What about searching the raw postscript in vi?
More information about the erlang-questions