yeah, we're just better then awk!

Bengt Kleberg eleberg@REDACTED
Mon Mar 3 15:02:58 CET 2003


> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 08:50:56 -0500
> From: Shawn Pearce <spearce@REDACTED>
> To: erlang-questions@REDACTED
> Subject: yeah, we're just better then awk!
> Mail-Followup-To: erlang-questions@REDACTED
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
> 
> Not sure if everyone has seen this:
> 
> http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/craps.shtml
> 
> Apparently Erlang is just above Awk in the totally arbitrary
> ranking of langauges based on memory, cpu usage and lines of
> code to implement the pointless tests.  :)

fyi: i have submitted more up-to-date versions of the erlang programs
(that run faster and are shorter), but they have not been accepted.
the reasons are
1 mr bagley is not updating his unix page.
2 the page that is updated, by somebody else, is using windows versions
of all languages. the windows version of erlang does not handle
erl -s module func < input_data
correctly. (no ''eof'' atom at end-of-file. this has been mentioned on
this list)


bengt 




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list