Structs

[Bjorn Gustavsson]

Because records are so important, we must really make sure we do it right this
time. We can't do another attempt (for one thing, it will be difficult to
find a new good keyword when both "record" and "struct" are in use :) ).

That's why other less important language features get done first.

/Bjorn

James Hague <jamesh@REDACTED> writes:

> >What about cond (or something like it)?
> >Isn't that coming soon to Erlang?
> 
> I was always under the impression that the reason records were never
> replaced with something neater was because there was little incentive to go
> in and fiddle with the core language.  But now "try" is on the way, as are
> structured modules, and possibly "cond."  Surely record improvements are a
> higher priority?
> 
> James
> 

-- 
Björn Gustavsson            Ericsson Utvecklings AB
bjorn@REDACTED      ÄT2/UAB/F/P
			    BOX 1505
+46 8 727 56 87 	    125 25 Älvsjö