James Hague <>
Fri Jan 17 16:17:43 CET 2003

> Now, Joe's structs look more promising, but we need to work
> out what the syntax and semantics should really be, and make
> sure that we don't replace records with something that will
> be subject to the same discussions a few years from now.

Agreed.  It's very exciting, though, that this is being addressed, even if
only at the discussion stage.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list