io:format() vs io_lib:format()
Wed Feb 26 16:22:18 CET 2003
io:format(Format, Args) uses io_lib:format(Format, Args) to create the
data that is written to stdout, so there should be absolutely no
difference in the result. Apart from that io_lib:format/2 returns a deep
string, and io:format/2 just does a side effect.
io:put_chars(io_lib:format(Format, Args)) would be exactly equivalent to
The feature in io_lib:format/2's return value is that the string need
not be flattened if it is supposed to be sent to e.g io:put_chars/1,
file:write/2 or erlang:port_command/2. It is a perfectly valid IO-list
and it is wasting time to flatten it if it is not needed.
/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
Bengt Kleberg wrote:
> are the differences between io:format() and io_lib:format() documented
> anywhere? or is there no difference?
> 3> io:format( "asd~s~n", ["asd"]).
> 4> io_lib:format( "asd~s~n", ["asd"]).
> io:format() gives me a single string.
> io_lib:format() gives me a string with a string as element 3 (0 based).
> is this a bug or a feature? or is it a result of flattening the string
> as it goes to stdout?
More information about the erlang-questions