Ingela Anderton ingela@REDACTED
Thu Sep 26 15:47:57 CEST 2002

Chandrashekhar Mullaparthi wrote:
> Lovely idea. Can we have it for R9 :)
We will not be implementing anything new and unthought of for R9,
however lovely it might be. (Also I am not sure I think this suggestion
would be lovely.) Actually the implementing phase of R9 is over now, we
are integrating, fixing bugs and other wrapping it up

> Chandru
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luke Gorrie [mailto:luke@REDACTED]
> Sent: 26 September 2002 14:01
> To: erlang-questions@REDACTED
> Subject: foo::bar(...)
> Hi all,
> I suggest that Erlang be extended to allow calling unexported
> functions. This could be restricted to the shell to avoid any
> software-engineering objections. The syntax could be "::", like:
>   foo::bar(1)
> This email (including attachments) is confidential.  If you have received
> this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this
> email from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any
> reliance upon its contents.  We cannot accept liability for any breaches of
> confidence arising through use of email.  Any opinions expressed in this
> email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not necessarily
> reflect our opinions.  We will not accept responsibility for any commitments
> made by our employees outside the scope of our business.  We do not warrant
> the accuracy or completeness of such information.
/m.v.h Ingela

Ericsson AB - OTP team

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list