Make replacement for Erlang - suggestions?

Eric Merritt cyberlync@REDACTED
Mon Sep 16 21:35:24 CEST 2002

 Support for make/gnumake has to be in place, thats a
given for the very reasons you mentioned. Fortunatly,
I believe that I can pick up most of this support from
some of the other available plugins. So it shouldn't
cost me much in the way of time. 

 I would like to see an alternative to make/gnumake.
This is largly due to the fact that I have a very,
very low opinion of make and make clones in general.


--- Francesco Cesarini
<francesco@REDACTED> wrote:
> In most large scale projects I have been involved
> in, we have used 
> gnumake, and whenever busted by some paranoid
> project manager, we moved 
> over to make. If you want to have as many people as
> possible use the 
> plug in, I would try to stick to the tools users in
> major projects 
> required to use (Freedom of choice is rarely an
> option on a large scale) 
> or at least try to facilitate their usage as much as
> possible... Even if 
> I have to admit, an Erlang variant sounds neat.
> Francesco
> --

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list