Make replacement for Erlang - suggestions?

Mikael Karlsson <>
Mon Sep 16 22:38:39 CEST 2002


Joe Armstrong has made ermake:

http://www.erlang.org/user.html#ermake-2.0

Don't know if it fullfils all your expectations, but
since it is done in Erlang I guess you could always
tailor it to your needs.

/Mikael

måndag 16 september 2002 21:35 skrev Eric Merritt:
> Francesco,
>  Support for make/gnumake has to be in place, thats a
> given for the very reasons you mentioned. Fortunatly,
> I believe that I can pick up most of this support from
> some of the other available plugins. So it shouldn't
> cost me much in the way of time.
>
>  I would like to see an alternative to make/gnumake.
> This is largly due to the fact that I have a very,
> very low opinion of make and make clones in general.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
> --- Francesco Cesarini
>
> <> wrote:
> > In most large scale projects I have been involved
> > in, we have used
> > gnumake, and whenever busted by some paranoid
> > project manager, we moved
> > over to make. If you want to have as many people as
> > possible use the
> > plug in, I would try to stick to the tools users in
> > major projects
> > required to use (Freedom of choice is rarely an
> > option on a large scale)
> > or at least try to facilitate their usage as much as
> > possible... Even if
> > I have to admit, an Erlang variant sounds neat.
> >
> > Francesco
> > --
> > http://www.erlang-consulting.com
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> http://news.yahoo.com




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list