Erlang improvement?
Helmut Enck-Radana
her@REDACTED
Wed Sep 19 20:00:05 CEST 2001
At 19:25 19-09-01, Kostis wrote:
> > There is no ambiguity; to perhaps obfuscate things even more, the
> > above notation is just "syntactic sugar" for
>[...]
>
>t2(M,F) ->
> apply(M,F,[bar,42]).
I thought the question was whether f(X):g(Y) should mean f(X):(g(Y)) or
(f(X):g)(Y).
-- Helmut
________________________________
Helmut Enck-Radana
Paradigma Software GmbH
http://www.paradigma-software.de
________________________________
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list